WebAuthn Server Implementation

The Cryptographic Referee

The WebAuthn Server layer (the Relying Party) is the ultimate arbiter of trust in a passwordless ecosystem. Its primary responsibility is to act as a “Cryptographic Referee”—issuing unique challenges to the user’s device and performing the rigorous mathematical verification of the resulting signatures. Unlike a traditional password database that stores sensitive shared secrets, a WebAuthn server only stores Public Keys. This architectural shift fundamentally eliminates the threat of credential breaches; even if the server’s database is fully compromised, the hacker cannot log in as the users because the corresponding private keys remain safely locked inside individual user hardware.

SERVER

RP Logic

Core Mission

Universal Assertion Validation. Implementing the rigorous mathematical and policy checks required to confirm that a cryptographic signal was truly generated by a trusted device and the authorized user.

Like the Sovereign Ledger: Imagine a courthouse that maintains a "Ledger of Official Stamps" (The Public Key Database). When anyone wants to file a document (The Authentication Request), they don't tell the clerk their secret password. Instead, they produce a stamped document. The clerk (The Server) looks up that person's stamp in the ledger and verifies the mark is identical. The clerk doesn't need to know how to *make* the stamp; they only need to know how to *verify* it against the ledger's record.

High-Security Backends / Auth Microservices / Cloud Identity Services

The Server Strategic Matrix

A robust relying party must manage three critical pillars: challenge lifecycle, cryptographic verification, and credential persistence.

Strategic Server Responsibilities

Responsibility	Strategic Value	Implementation Detail
Challenge Mgmt	Replay protection.	Generating unguessable, time-bounded nonces.
Key Persistence	Identity continuity.	Mapping CredentialID to a specific user account.
Sig Verification	Cryptographic certainty.	Implementing COSE/JWK key parsing and ECC math.
Policy Enforcement	Compliance & Risk.	Verifying UserVerification and Origin binding.

The Validation Cycle

The server orchestrates the security ceremony, ensuring that every interaction is fresh and untampered.

graph TD
    User[User Attempt] --> Gen[Generate Options & Challenge]
    Gen --> StoreCh[Store Challenge in Session]
    StoreCh --> Recv[Receive Signed Assertion]
    Recv --> Verify[Verify Signature & Origin]
    Verify --> Persistence[Increment Signature Counter]
    Persistence --> Grant[Grant Access Token]

1

Generate & Track

The server creates the `challenge` and temporary state. It must store this challenge (typically in an encrypted session or a high-speed cache) to ensure that when the signed result returns, it corresponds to the exact request it just issued.

2

Validate Boundary

The server rigorously inspects the `clientDataJSON`. It confirms the `origin` matches the application's domain and the `challenge` matches the one previously stored. This is the primary defense against phishing and man-in-the-middle attacks.

3

Signature Math

The server retrieves the user's previously registered `PublicKey`. It uses a cryptographic library to verify that the `signature` provided by the authenticator was indeed generated using the corresponding Private Key over the assertion data.

---

Technical Server Implementation

Validating a WebAuthn assertion requires specialized logic for parsing COSE-formatted public keys.

Verification Logic (Pseudocode Example)

// Conceptual Server-Side Assertion Validation
async function verifyAssertion(assertionResponse, storedPublicKey) {
    // 1. Reconstruct signed data (ClientData + AuthenticatorData)
    const signedData = concat(assertionResponse.authenticatorData, hash(assertionResponse.clientDataJSON));

    // 2. Perform SHA256withECDSA or RS256 verification
    const isValid = await crypto.verify(
        "ES256",
        storedPublicKey,
        assertionResponse.signature,
        signedData
    );

    if (!isValid) throw new SecurityError("Invalid cryptographic signature");

    // 3. Update Signature Counter to detect cloned authenticators
    await db.updateSigCounter(assertionResponse.credentialId, assertionResponse.counter);
}

WebAuthn Implementation Guides

Master the technical ceremonies of the passwordless server ecosystem.

WebAuthn Overview

Strategic foundational principles for FIDO2 and passwordless security.

Enrollment Backend

Handling the first-time storage of public keys and the verification of hardware attestation.

Client Integration

How the front-end application orchestrates the handshake that the server validates.

Passkey Server Logic

Adapting your server to handle synchronized credentials and discoverable resident keys.

Next Steps

• Explore FIDO Metadata Service (MDS) for verifying hardware certifications on your server.
• Review Signature Counter Management for detecting and neutralizing cloned authenticators.
• Check Open-Source FIDO2 Server Libraries for production-ready implementations in Go, Java, and Node.js.